Interstate 808

Ian Maleney, in blog form.

I’ve been making a lot of more techno-influenced music lately and I’ve come to the rather annoying conclusion that I don’t like it. None of it. I mean, there are interesting bits and pieces in there but on the whole, it’s a bit of a failure. 

I’ve been making music with beats for almost as long as I’ve been making music at all but these days I like to think I know a bit more about the kind of techno I like, what I want from it and how I’d like it to work.

On the non-techno side, I’ve been concentrating all year on longer, softer, work. Ambient, drone, field recordings; situations that encourage and reward deep listening. Central to that has been removing myself from the process more, allowing the music to take form unconsciously or as close as I can get. I set parameters, create tones, let the rest unfold as naturally as possible, in a variety of different forms. As long as I’m not sitting there sequencing things, controlling everything, then I’m happy. It’ll resonate or it wont and that’s fine. I feel like I’m getting somewhere with that, slowly but surely.

I can’t seem to get into the same mindset with techno though. I can’t get myself out of the picture enough to make myself happy. I keep getting in the way. I keep interjecting with some half-baked idea that messes with the flow of the tune. I need to find a way to shut myself out more.

When I look back on the dance music moments that have had the biggest effect on me this year, it’s never been “statement” techno. It’s never had anything big about it really, least of all big ideas about itself. Meditation is a process of reduction, on a dancefloor as much as anywhere else.

Keep it simple, stupid. 

Hatred Of Music - So Academic

Taking a look at Holly Herndon’s fantastic début album and the links it makes between the so-called academic world and the club world.

PS: You studied jazz drumming when you were younger, and you have a history in hip-hop and house music as well. Do you know what it is about techno that makes it, for you, the ultimate genre?

JM: I know what it is so far. It’s evolving and it’s going to go much further. So far, it is a genre that’s difficult to determine exactly what it’s supposed to be. And that opens up all possibilities. For instance, I can tap on a table, but if I can tap on a table with my hand in a way that gives you the impression you’re experiencing something that is reminiscent of the future, that, to me, falls under the category of techno. It’s one of the few genres, maybe the only genre, that deals with frequencies at the same level as notes and chords — meaning that the sound of white noise is perceived the same way by the listener as a note on the piano. That’s the most important indication, because that means that the people are really willing and ready to explore more of the unknown, which you don’t quite find in other genres. You don’t find that in rock or hip-hop or other things. So that’s also a very strong indication that whatever sounds may come in our future, they will probably find a place in techno or electronic music. And that gives the genre some type of insurance that it can always accommodate whatever’s going to come. You can see it now with the way that we’re using computer sequencers and software to sequence the music. I think that’s also an indication that it’s going to transform and do whatever it takes to move forward. Even without us pushing it, I think it’s set up for that already. That I find to be very exciting. And I think that using all these tools, and if people utilize them in the right way, the genre could become much more relevant to people’s lives way off the dance floor. It could be come something closer to what rock was to people in the ’60s.

Jeff Mills in conversation with Philip Sherbourne.

The man is a never ending-font of techno wisdom and this is a really great interview. My love for Mills grows and grows, with each passing day. 

The Quietus: Surely, with a mode of music that’s as obviously reactive as dance music, the temptation to please the crowd must be enormous.

Jeff Mills: But the idea of people deciding whether they like it or not gets in the way of music being a way of developing musical creativity. Making them happy denies that. I eventually decided they had to be taken out of the equation. The music is for them but your intention should not to be loved by the crowd and to make lots of money.

Nice interview with Jeff Mills over on tQ

I hope to interview Mills again some time in the future, when I’m more prepared, more knowledgeable. I hope it’ll be in person. 

His set at Twisted Pepper the other week was one of the best musical experiences of my life. It had the kind of over-powering musical weight that I’ve only really experienced at the best punk shows, where you’re struggling to breathe and your heart is pumping and your body is moving in ways unrelated to your thoughts. It’s all just happening at a pace you can barely keep up with. You give up control to it.  Punk shows usually last about half an hour, Mills played for over three hours. An unbelievable, mind-melting, life-changing night. 

RA: Breaking Through - Skirt

Hugely impressed by the songs here. Definitely my favourite breaking artist on RA in ages. Can really hear the Surgeon influence on some tracks but really it’s quite unlike anything in particular. Deep though, that’s for sure. 

Misery Beat: My Year In Techno

So I woke up this morning to read this article by Rory Gibb for the Quietus. It touches on what has been one of the primary threads in my own listening habits over the course of 2011 and it seems like as good as place as any to start a little end-of-year look over one’s shoulder. 

Read More